Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Studia Humanitatis Journal
Articles: monographic section

Climate disinformation and polarization: challenges for democratic governance in the digital sphere

Juan Carlos Solano Lucas
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2145-4613 (unauthenticated) Universidad de Murcia, España

Bio
Juan Antonio Clemente Soler
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2272-6219 (unauthenticated)

Bio
Renato Sebastián Larrea Pazmiño
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8726-1576 (unauthenticated)

Bio

Published 2026-08-13

Keywords

  • Disinformation,
  • Polarisation,
  • Digital democracy,
  • Climate change

Abstract

Digitalisation has broadened access to environmental information, but has also intensified disinformation and polarisation, putting strain on democratic quality and the capacity to sustain redistributive climate policies. This article presents the results of a mixed-methods study combining secondary analysis of survey series from the Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS) and the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) on belief in climate change and associated attitudes, with cross-tabulations by ideology, sex, and educational level, and thematic analysis of six focus groups conducted in different Spanish regions. The quantitative evidence reveals socially structured patterns of acceptance, doubt and scepticism, with consistent differences by educational level and political ideology. The qualitative discourses surface “information fatigue”, the circulation of contradictory narratives and the ambivalent role of social media: they facilitate mobilisation around climate change, but also foster disengagement and distrust, hindering consensus-building. Climate disinformation is interpreted as a digital governance problem that erodes institutional trust and weakens public deliberation, undermining the legitimacy of the ecological transition and, with it, the sustainability of the welfare state.

References

  1. Boykoff, M. T. (2011). Who speaks for the climate? Making sense of media reporting on climate change. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Bruns, A. (2019). Are filter bubbles real? Polity Press.
  3. Bush, S. S., & Clayton, A. (2023). Facing Change: Gender and Climate Change Attitudes Worldwide. American Political Science Review, 117(2), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055422000752
  4. Callejo, J. (2020). El discurso ausente: el caso del cambio climático. Papers. Revista de Sociologia, 106(2), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.2802
  5. Center for Countering Digital Hate. (2024). The new denial: Climate solution misinformation on social media. https://counterhate.com/research/the-new-denial-climate-solution-misinformation/
  6. Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
  7. Dunlap, R. E., & McCright, A. M. (2011). Climate change denial: Sources, actors, and strategies. En C. Lever-Tracy (Ed.), Routledge international handbook of climate change and society (pp. 240–259). Routledge.
  8. Dunlap, R. E., McCright, A. M., & Yarosh, J. H. (2016). The political divide on climate change: Partisan polarization widens in the U.S. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 58(5), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2016.1208995
  9. Farrell, J. (2016). Network structure and influence of the climate change counter-movement. Nature Climate Change, 6, 370–374. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2875
  10. Farrell, J. (2019). The growth of climate change misinformation in US philanthropy: Evidence from natural language processing. Environmental Research Letters, 14(3), 034013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf939
  11. Gough, I. (2017). Heat, greed and human need: Climate change, capitalism and sustainable wellbeing. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  12. Gurr, G., Schumann, C., & Metag, J. (2022). Negative effects of long-lasting media attention to public issues on recipients: Conceptualizing issue fatigue. Studies in Communication Sciences, 22(2), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2022.02.007
  13. Habermas, J. (2022). Reflections and hypotheses on a further structural transformation of the political public sphere. Theory, Culture & Society, 39(4), 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221112341
  14. Heras, F., & Meira, P. (2017). Cuando lo importante no es relevante. La sociedad española ante el cambio climático. Papeles de Relaciones Ecosociales y Cambio Global, 136, 43–53.
  15. Koch, M., & Fritz, M. (2014). Building the eco-social state: Do welfare regimes matter? Journal of Social Policy, 43(4), 679–703. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727941400035X
  16. Lázaro, L., González-Enríquez, C., & Francés, G. E. (2019). Los españoles ante el cambio climático: Apoyo ciudadano a los elementos, instrumentos y procesos de una Ley de Cambio Climático y Transición Energética. Real Instituto Elcano.
  17. McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011a). Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 21(4), 1163–1172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003
  18. McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011b). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 155–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
  19. Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. PublicAffairs.
  20. Naciones Unidas. (2022). Sexto Informe de Evaluación del IPCC. Grupo Intergubernamental de Expertos sobre el Cambio Climático.
  21. Nicolosi, E., Medina, R. M., Brewer, S., Vorkink, M., & Allred, A. (2025). The new denial: Climate solution misinformation on social media. Global Sustainability, 8, e31. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2025.10016
  22. Norgaard, K. M. (2011). Living in denial: Climate change, emotions, and everyday life. MIT Press.
  23. Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2011.128.2.435
  24. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.
  25. Retamal, M., Rojas, J., & Parra, O. (2011). Percepción al cambio climático y a la gestión del agua: aportes de las estrategias metodológicas cualitativas para su comprensión. Ambiente & Sociedade, XIV(1), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-753X2011000100010
  26. Rodon, T. (2024). ¿Las actitudes frente al cambio climático en España varían con la edad? Observatorio Social, Fundación La Caixa. https://elobservatoriosocial.fundacionlacaixa.org
  27. Sunstein, C. R. (2018). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv8xnhtd
  28. Supran, G., & Oreskes, N. (2017). Assessing ExxonMobil's climate change communications (1977–2014). Environmental Research Letters, 12(8), 084019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa815f
  29. Torre, R. R., & Gallego, J. C. (2022). La preocupación social por el cambio climático en España: una aproximación cualitativa. Política y Sociedad, 59(3). https://doi.org/10.5209/poso.74131
  30. Treen, K. M., Williams, H. T. P., & O'Neill, S. J. (2020). Online misinformation about climate change. WIREs Climate Change, 11(5), e665. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.665
  31. Valdor, P., Gracia, A., & Quevedo, N. (2020). Investigación social de la percepción del cambio climático en España. Red4C: Ciencia Ciudadana y Cambio Climático.
  32. Velasco Gisbert, M. L., Bartolomé Esteban, C., & Suso Araico, A. (2020). Género y cambio climático: Un diagnóstico de situación. Instituto de la Mujer y para la Igualdad de Oportunidades, Ministerio de Igualdad. https://www.miteco.gob.es/eu/ceneam/recursos/pag-web/genero-cambio-climatico.html